2006 CHEVROLET COBALT SS UPGRADE

I like the heritage of the old muscle cars as much as the next guy, but this 'save it for the REAL musclcars' is complete crap. This next part is a general rant, directed at any that it applies to:

2006 CHEVROLET COBALT SS UPGRADE

If they want to use the RS designation on a Cobalt, SO WHAT! The RS was an interior and exterior upgrade package.NOTHING MORE! Just as there were various levels of GT's, RT's, 'Cudas etc. Why not? Historically, there were various levels of SS's (327, 350, 396) available in the same model year, on the same car. The really sad thing is this SS crap is going worse. If GM has to put a badge on it just put a 2.4L badge on it. GM can bring back that badge when they bring back the Camaro. I donвЂ™t think the 2.4 Cobalt should get the RS badge. ItвЂ™s the same stupid mistake over an over an over an over an over an over again.

Pontiac doesnвЂ™t need an SUV, but GM thinks if they give them one and call it a performance SUV it will sell. Look at the new Pontiac Torrent itвЂ™s just a rebadged Equinox and what does GM say about it вЂњThe Torrent represents a new dimension of the Pontiac's commitment to 'total performance,' вЂќ. Now when GM comes out with a new sport car, truck or SUV people expect it to be crap and there usually right. It didnвЂ™t work then or any of the other times they tried in the past 33 years and they just keep doing it. My point about the 1972 GTO is that it was the first year GM started trying to use performance badges to sell cars that didnвЂ™t perform.

2006 chevrolet cobalt ss